2024年5月4日发(作者：)

不同意使用反剽窃软件的英语作文

English:

Using anti-plagiarism software is a contentious issue with valid

arguments on both sides. While some argue that it is necessary to

uphold academic integrity and prevent intellectual theft, others

contend that it stifles creativity and discourages critical thinking.

Proponents of anti-plagiarism software argue that it serves as a

deterrent against plagiarism, ensuring that students produce original

work and receive credit for their ideas. Moreover, it helps educators

identify instances of academic dishonesty and maintain the

credibility of educational institutions. However, opponents assert

that relying solely on such software undermines the development of

essential skills such as research, synthesis, and citation. Students may

become overly reliant on technology to detect plagiarism rather than

learning how to properly attribute sources and construct their

arguments. Additionally, the rigid algorithms of anti-plagiarism

software may fail to account for nuances in writing style or cultural

differences, leading to false positives and unfair accusations. In

essence, while anti-plagiarism software can be a useful tool in

upholding academic integrity, its indiscriminate use without

considering its limitations may hinder rather than foster intellectual

growth and creativity.

Translated content:

使用反剽窃软件是一个有争议的问题，双方都有合理的论点。一些人认为有

必要维护学术诚信，防止知识盗窃，而另一些人则认为这会抑制创造力，阻

碍批判性思维。支持使用反剽窃软件的人认为，它可以作为防范剽窃的威慑，

确保学生提交原创作品并获得他们的观点的认可。此外，它还帮助教育工作

者识别学术不诚实的行为，并维护教育机构的信誉。然而，反对者则认为，

仅依赖这种软件会削弱学生的研究、综合和引用等重要技能的培养。学生可

能会过度依赖技术来检测剽窃，而不是学习如何正确引用来源并构建自己的

论点。此外，反剽窃软件的刚性算法可能无法考虑写作风格的细微差别或文

化差异，导致误报和不公平的指责。总之，虽然反剽窃软件可以是维护学术

诚信的有用工具，但是如果不考虑其局限性就盲目使用，可能会阻碍而不是

促进智力成长和创造力。