2024年3月22日发(作者：)

21 November 2017

2017 list of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs)

1. The Financial Stability Board (FSB), in consultation with Basel Committee on Banking

Supervision (BCBS) and national authorities, has identified the 2017 list of global

systemically important banks (G-SIBs), using end-2016 data and the updated assessment

methodology published by the BCBS in July 2013.

1

One bank has been added to and one

bank has been removed from the list of G-SIBs that were identified in 2016, and therefore

the overall number of G-SIBs remains 30 (see Annex).

2. The changes in the allocation of the institutions to buckets (see below for details) reflect

the combined effects of changes in underlying activity and the use of supervisory

judgement.

3. In November 2011 the FSB published an integrated set of policy measures to address the

systemic and moral hazard risks associated with systemically important financial

institutions (SIFIs).

2

In that publication, the FSB identified as global systemically important

financial institutions (G-SIFIs) an initial group of G-SIBs, using a methodology developed

by the BCBS. The November 2011 report noted that the group of G-SIBs would be updated

annually based on new data and published by the FSB each November.

4. FSB member authorities apply the following requirements to G-SIBs:

Higher capital buffer: Since the November 2012 update, the G-SIBs have been allocated

to buckets corresponding to higher capital buffers that they are required to hold by national

authorities in accordance with international standards. Higher capital buffer requirements

began to be phased in from 1 January 2016 for G-SIBs (based on the November 2014

assessment) with full implementation by 1 January 2019. The capital buffer requirements

for the G-SIBs identified in the annual update each November will apply to them as from

January fourteen months later. The assignment of G-SIBs to the buckets, in the list

published today, determines the higher capital buffer requirements that will apply to each

G-SIB from 1 January 2019.

3

1

2

3

See BCBS, Global systemically important banks: updated assessment methodology and the higher loss absorbency

requirement, July 2013 (/publ/).

See FSB, Policy Measures to Address Systemically Important Financial Institutions, 4 November 2011

(/2011/11/r_111104bb/

).

Based on the implementation schedule, G-SIBs identified this November will be required to hold in 2019 100% of the

higher loss absorbency applying to the bucket of systemic importance to which they have been allocated in the list

published today (/bcbs/publ/). The Basel III monitoring results published by the Basel Committee

Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity (TLAC): G-SIBs are required to meet the TLAC standard,

alongside the regulatory capital requirements set out in the Basel III framework.

4

The

TLAC standard will be phased-in from 1 January 2019 for G-SIBs identified in the 2015

list (provided that they continue to be designated as G-SIBs thereafter).

Resolvability: These include group-wide resolution planning and regular resolvability

assessments. The resolvability of each G-SIB is also reviewed in a high-level FSB

Resolvability Assessment Process (RAP) by senior regulators within the firms’ Crisis

Management Groups.

5

Higher supervisory expectations: These include supervisory expectations for risk

management functions, risk data aggregation capabilities, risk governance and internal

controls.

6

5. In November 2014 the BCBS published a technical summary of the methodology, as well

as the links to the G-SIBs’ public disclosures.

7

The BCBS publishes the annually updated

denominators used to calculate banks’ scores, and the thresholds used to allocate the banks

to buckets and provides the links to the public disclosures of the full sample of banks

assessed, as determined by the sample criteria set out in the BCBS G-SIB framework.

8

6. A new list of G-SIBs will next be published in November 2018.

provide evidence on the aggregate capital ratios under the transitional and fully phased-in Basel III frameworks, as well

as the additional loss absorbency requirements for G-SIBs (/bcbs/publ/).

4

See FSB, Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) Principles and Term Sheet, 9 November 2015

(/2015/11/total-loss-absorbing-capacity-tlac-principles-and-term-sheet/

). The BCBS published the final

standard on the regulatory capital treatment of banks’ investments in instruments that comprise TLAC for G-SIBs on 12

October 2016 (/bcbs/publ/)

See FSB, Ten years on – taking stock of post-crisis resolution reforms, 6 July 2017 (/2017/07/ten-years-on-

taking-stock-of-post-crisis-resolution-reforms/).

The timeline for G-SIBs to meet this requirement were set out in the November 2013 update. See FSB, 2013 update of

group of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), November 2013 (

/wp-

content/uploads/r_).

See BCBS, The G-SIB assessment methodology – score calculation (/bcbs/publ/)

See BCBS, Global systemically important banks: Assessment methodology and the additional loss absorbency requirement

(/bcbs/gsib/

)

5

6

7

8

2

G-SIBs as of November 2017

9

allocated to buckets corresponding to

required levels of additional capital buffers

Bucket

10

5

(3.5%)

4

(2.5%)

3

(2.0%)

G-SIBs in alphabetical order within each bucket

(Empty)

JP Morgan Chase

Bank of America

Citigroup

Deutsche Bank

HSBC

Bank of China

Barclays

BNP Paribas

China Construction Bank

Goldman Sachs

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited

Mitsubishi UFJ FG

Wells Fargo

Agricultural Bank of China

Bank of New York Mellon

Credit Suisse

Groupe Crédit Agricole

ING Bank

Mizuho FG

Morgan Stanley

Nordea

Royal Bank of Canada

Royal Bank of Scotland

Santander

Société Générale

Standard Chartered

State Street

Sumitomo Mitsui FG

UBS

Unicredit Group

Annex

2

(1.5%)

1

(1.0%)

9

Compared with the list of G-SIBs published in 2016, the number of banks identified as G-SIBs remains the same. One bank (Royal

Bank of Canada) has been added to and one bank (Groupe BPCE) has been removed from the list. Two banks moved to a higher

bucket: both Bank of China and China Construction Bank moved from bucket 1 to 2. Three banks moved to a lower bucket:

Citigroup moved from bucket 4 to 3, BNP Paribas moved from bucket 3 to 2, and Credit Suisse moved from bucket 2 to 1.

The bucket approach is defined in Table 2 of the Basel Committee document Global systemically important banks: updated

assessment methodology and the higher loss absorbency requirement

,

July 2013. The numbers in parentheses are the required level

of additional common equity loss absorbency as a percentage of risk-weighted assets that each G-SIB will be required to hold in

2019.

10

3