2024年3月14日发(作者：)

Advances in Psychology 心理学进展, 2015, 5(11), 695-701

Published Online November 2015 in Hans. /journal/ap

/10.12677/ap.2015.511090

Reliability and Validity in the

Chinese Version of the Acceptance

and Action Questionnaire-2

nd

Edition (AAQ-II) and the Chinese

Version of Cognitive Fusion

Questionnaire (CFQ) in Hui

and Kazak Adolescents

Xiaolong Wang

1

, Jing Cao

2*

, Jing An

3*

, Wanbing Ding

4*

, Yulan Suo

4*

, Hua Su

4*

, Yan Li

5*

,

Zhuohong Zhu

2#

, Yonglong Tang

1#

1

2

School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing

Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing

3

Changji University, Changji Xinjiang

4

High School of Hui, Changji Xinjiang

5

Youth Activity Center, Yining Xinjiang

Received: Nov. 4

th

, 2015; accepted: Nov. 23

rd

, 2015; published: Nov. 25

th

, 2015

Copyright © 2015 by authors and Hans Publishers Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).

/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

Objective: To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Acceptance and Action

Questionnaire-2

nd

Edition (AAQ-II) and the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ) and to offer a

measurement tool in studies of experiential avoidance and cognitive fusion. Methods: By conven-

ience sampling method, two samples of Kazakh high school students (n

1

= 248) and Hui college

students (n

2

= 234) were selected and assessed with the AAQ-II and CFQ for item analysis, internal

consistency analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS)

and Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) were administered to test the criterion-related validity. Results:

The confirmatory factor analysis verified the one-factor model of AAQ-II and CFQ. The Cronbach’s

α coefficient of the two scales for the two samples was 0.845 and 0.860 (AAQ-II), 0.892 and 0.902

*

对本文贡献相同。

#

通讯作者。

文章引用: 王小龙, 曹静, 安静, 丁万兵, 索玉兰, 苏华, 李燕, 祝卓宏, 汤永隆(2015). 中文接纳与行动问卷第二版

(AAQ-II)与认知融合问卷(CFQ)在回族和哈萨克族青少年中的信效度检验.

心理学进展

, 5(11), 695-701.

/10.12677/ap.2015.511090

王小龙 等

(CFQ), respectively. Concurrent validity results showed that AAQ-II was positively correlated with

total scores of SDS (r

1

= 0.424, r

2

= 0.409, P < 0.01) and SAS (r

1

= 0.436, r

2

= 0.474, P < 0.01); CFQ

was also positively correlated with total scores of SDS (r

1

= 0.459, r

2

= 0.334, P < 0.01) and SAS (r

1

= 0.393, r

2

= 0.442, P < 0.01). Conclusion: It suggests that the Chinese version of AAQ-II and CFQ are

reliable and valid assessment for experiential avoidance and cognitive fusion in minority groups.

Keywords

Experiential Avoidance, Cognitive Fusion, Kazakh, Hui, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy,

Reliability, Validity

中文接纳与行动问卷第二版(AAQ-II)

与认知融合问卷(CFQ)在回族

和哈萨克族青少年中的信效度检验

王小龙

1

，曹 静

2*

，安 静

3*

，丁万兵

4*

，索玉兰

4*

，苏 华

4*

，李 燕

5*

，祝卓宏

2#

，汤永隆

1#

1

2

西南大学心理学部，重庆

中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室，北京

3

新疆昌吉州昌吉学院，新疆 昌吉

4

新疆昌吉州回民中学，新疆 昌吉

5

新疆伊犁州伊宁市青少年活动中心，新疆 伊宁

收稿日期：2015年11月4日；录用日期：2015年11月23日；发布日期：2015年11月25日

摘 要

目的：检验中文版接纳与行动问卷第二版(AAQ-II)与认知融合问卷(CFQ)中文版在哈萨克族(以下简称“哈

族”)高中生群体和回族大学生群体中的信效度，为研究经验性回避以及认知融合提供可靠有效的测量工

具。方法：采用方便抽样选取哈族高中生群体和回族大学生群体两个样本共482位被试(n

1

= 248, n

2

=

234)

施测AAQ-II、CFQ，并进行项目分析、内部一致性检验和验证性因素分析，同时施测自评抑郁量表

(SDS)、自评焦虑量表(SAS)以检验校标关联效度。结果：AAQ-II量表在两个样本中的 Cronbach α系数

分别为0.845、0.860；CFQ量表在两个样本中的Cronbach α系数分别为0.892、0.902；验证性因素分析

显示两个量表的单因素模型拟合良好。校标效度检验显示，AAQ-II得分与SDS得分呈显著正相关(r

1

=

0.424, r

2

= 0.409, P < 0.01)，与SAS得分呈显著正相关(r

1

= 0.436, r

2

= 0.474, P < 0.01)；CFQ得分与SDS

得分呈显著正相关(r

1

= 0.459, r

2

= 0.334, P < 0.01) ，与SAS得分呈显著正相关(r

1

= 0.393, r

2

= 0.442, P

< 0.01)

。结论：AAQ-II、CFQ中文版在哈族高中生群体和回族大学生群体中具有较好的信效度，可在我

国用于相关研究。

关键词

经验性回避，认知融合，哈萨克族，回族，接纳与承诺疗法，信度，效度

696